History of GSM
During the early 1980s, analog cellular telephone systems
were experiencing rapid growth in Europe, particularly in Scandinavia and the
United Kingdom, but also in France and Germany. Each country developed its own
system, which was incompatible with everyone else's in equipment and operation.
This was an undesirable situation, because not only was the mobile equipment
limited to operation within national boundaries, which in a unified Europe were
increasingly unimportant, but there was also a very limited market for each
type of equipment, so economies of scale and the subsequent savings could not
be realized.
The Europeans realized this early
on, and in 1982 the Conference of European Posts and Telegraphs (CEPT) formed a
study group called the Groupe Spécial Mobile (GSM) to study and develop a
pan-European public land mobile system. The proposed system had to meet certain
criteria:
Good subjective speech
quality
Low terminal and service cost
Support for international
roaming
Ability to support handheld
terminals
Support for range of new
services and facilities
Spectral efficiency
ISDN compatibility
In 1989, GSM responsibility was transferred to the European
Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI), and phase I of the GSM
specifications were published in 1990. Commercial service was started in
mid-1991, and by 1993 there were 36 GSM networks in 22 countries . Although standardized
in Europe, GSM is not only a European standard. Over 200 GSM networks
(including DCS1800 and PCS1900) are operational in 110 countries around the
world. In the beginning of 1994, there were 1.3 million subscribers worldwide , which had grown
to more than 55 million by October 1997. With North America making a delayed
entry into the GSM field with a derivative of GSM called PCS1900, GSM systems
exist on every continent, and the acronym GSM now aptly stands for Global
System for Mobile communications.
The developers of GSM chose an
unproven (at the time) digital system, as opposed to the then-standard analog
cellular systems like AMPS in the United States and TACS in the United Kingdom.
They had faith that advancements in compression algorithms and digital signal
processors would allow the fulfillment of the original criteria and the
continual improvement of the system in terms of quality and cost. The over 8000
pages of GSM recommendations try to allow flexibility and competitive
innovation among suppliers, but provide enough standardization to guarantee
proper interworking between the components of the system. This is done by
providing functional and interface descriptions for each of the functional
entities defined in the system